Tan PC, Jacob R, Omar SZ (2006) Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Tan PC, Khine PP, Sabdin NH, Vallikkannu N, Sulaiman S (2011) Effect of membrane sweeping on cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography and impact of cervical shortening on Caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(7):681–687 Yildirim G, Gunqorduk K, Karadaq OI, Aslan H, Turhan E, Ceylan Y (2010) Membrane sweeping in low risk patients at term pregnancy a randomized control trial. Obstet Gynecol 97(2):189–194ĭare FO, Oboro VO (2002) The role of membranes stripping in prevention of post-term pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial in Ile-Ife. Tailpale P, Hiilesmaa V (2001) Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Membrane stripping reduces the incidence of post-term pregnancy and need for formal induction of labor in post-date pregnant women, without increased maternal or neonatal complications.ĭe Miranda E, Van der Bom JG, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP, Rosendaal FR (2006) Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low risk pregnancies: a randomized control trial. However, maternal and neonatal complications were similar between the two groups. The procedure also significantly reduced the need for ‘formal’ labor induction. Membrane stripping reduced the duration of pregnancy by 3 days ( P < 0.001). ![]() The intervention group received membrane stripping while the control group did not receive membrane stripping. ![]() MethodologyĪ randomized controlled trial of 134 post-date pregnant women at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, from February to November 2012. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of membrane stripping at 40–41 weeks of gestation as a means of preventing post-term pregnancy and the need for formal induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |